
2.10.09
The best b'day of my life...

9.8.09
And Pigs Shall Fly!!!
5.8.09
Sleeper Class and me...
27.7.09
Short and tweet - the twitter camp Quiz by IQL!
The Indian Quizzing League team was involved in the Organizing Committee of the inaugural Twitter Unconference titled Buzz140! in Chennai on June 21, 2009. Even though the venue was quite far away from the heart of the city (Photon Infotech, the venue is in the middle of OMR, about 30 kms from the heart of Chennai), quite a few tweeps turned up.
There were around 60 odd teams (teams of two each) that participated in the prelims (some of the 150 odd people that turned up for the event left after lunch). The Prelims hosted by Ananthashankar had 20 questions with in-built tie breakers.
Karthik Narayan (KN as I call him) hosted a rather quickfire, fun-oriented and tech-savvy final. The final consisted of three simple rounds – round one was a Twitter based round – with questions based on tweets, and within 140 characters. This premise ensured the questions were short and sweet!! Round two was an innovation of cryptic clues to identify technology websites and people associated with technology. The quiz ended with the last round which was a grid where teams could pick their questions and answer. The quiz ended with a photo-finish where three teams on equal scores. Eventually as many as 4 tie breakers were required to separate the Best of two teams out of three!!
Two students from Anna University won the quiz on the penultimate question and Sylvian Patrick and Ahmed from Zoho came second when they scored on the last question!! The audience had their share of the fun with questions redirected at them which they answered with glee. They were also highly appreciative of the quiz and the questions.
By hosting this quiz, a little piece of history had been created - this was officially the first Twitter Live Quiz in the entire world. That's a perhaps the biggest feather so far in IQL's hat!!
IQL is continuing the good job by hosting an online Twitter Quiz which can be accessed on http://twitter.com/oceansiql
About Twitter:
Twitter is a free social networking and micro-blogging service that enables its users to send and read messages known as tweets. Tweets are text-based posts of up to 140 characters displayed on the author's profile page and delivered to the author's subscribers who are known as followers.
17.7.09
Benefits of Defence Spending
It’s been quite sometime since I have done any sensible blogging. One of my friends asked me the other day, telling me that “your job has made you lose interest in the thing you loved to do so much”. Hence I have decided to come back and try to post one article every week. I have decided to write about the things that I read - something that may come in handy to those who are preparing for debates or arguments. I will also provide links to the articles as and when I get any.
This short post of mine is in reference to an article written in the column “Cross Hairs” written by Mr. Raghuraman. This article appeared in the July 16th edition of the newspaper “Mint”. This article is helpful for CAT aspirants and the like, because it presents a very interesting and logical argument as to why we should spend more on defence (contrary to common sense) and on how it is advantageous to us.
One main point that the author puts forth is that wars are inevitable in the modern human community. Resources are scarce and everyone wants to control them. The demand for these resources will increase with the scarcity levels and so will the need to control them – thereby leading to more wars. Hence defence spending is a must to gather new resources or defend the existing resources.
The author puts forth 4 major points as to how wars have helped shape civilization for the better:
1. A war helps mobilize inventions. Although wars and the fear of it may not actually lead to an invention, it helps make the invention available to us in a mass scale. Communications, sonar and radar are just few of the examples that show how spending on defence leads to better innovations that can redefine the current technology. Just look at the prevalence of the Internet, nuclear power and transcontinental communications in our daily lives.
2. The Defence Sector creates opportunities for thousands of young minds, who are trained to become a disciplined set of leaders. On their discharge from service, they contribute back to the society by their leadership in driving the society through different entrepreneurial ventures. Capt. Gopinath is one such example, whose low-cost airlines revolutionized the Indian Aviation Sector. Such men bring with them a national outlook and vision for the betterment of the society.
3. Weapons industry may incur a lot of expenditure, but it also contributes a lot back to the GDP of the country. The Indian Defence Sector recovers as much as 50% of the weapons’ cost by placing contracts that an “offset policy” which makes it compulsory that the arms-seller has to buy or provision up to 50% of the cost of the weapons from Indian manufacturers. This policy usually comes in place in a G-to-G trade as it helps to develop trade between the two countries. This gives incentives for the foreign companies to collaborate with Indian partners to make indigenous equipment to fulfill this offset obligation, thereby facilitating technology transfer into Indian industries – thereby having the following 3 advantages:
a) Sellers will need to transfer technology to make indigenous equipment.
b) In the longer duration, it will lead the seller and his Indian partner down the road into “offshoring” – where the weapons could be built at a lower cost enabling it to become globally competitive and establish India as a global defence production and service hub.
c) Defence spending is largely recession-proof and will help the manufacturing sector stay in business even in bad times.
4. Our defence budget also consists of regular revenue expenditure in the form of salaries, allowances and sustenance costs of maintaining an army. Food has to be bought, roads have to be built, vehicles need to ply and the agricultural produce of several thousand villages goes to maintaining garrisons stationed all over the country. An entire ecosystem thrives on maintaining and mobilizing the defence forces. Cantonment towns are examples of cities which have been fuelled by defence establishments that literally created them. (Taken directly from the article).
We can see that the defence sector has a big role to play in strengthening our country’s economy by virtue of its trade potential and manpower.
Link to the article:
9.7.09
Is the Price Right?
Anurag: Then why is suicide a crime? Do I, or do I not, own my life?
Satish: Well, one’s life is a different thing altogether. You cannot compare your life to any other thing...
Anurag: But do I own my life or not?
Satish: Hmmm...
What would you say to this? Is your life your own? If yes, then why is an attempt to commit suicide a crime? If no, then who has the right over one’s life?
Suicide is considered a crime in this modern age. In this era, where the word freedom is as misused as public funds, a person doesn’t have the freedom over one’s own life. Where is the freedom if one doesn’t have freedom over one’s own life – the only thing we were born with when we came to earth?
People give many reasons as to why suicide is a crime. Some if the common ones are as follows:
1. It is doing injustice to your self. Just because you are in bad times doesn’t mean that you must end your life. Good times and bad times come in cycles and you have to just wait it out
2. Suicide is the last resort. Life is precious. Human life is a gift from God and it will end only when God wills it to end
3. Think about your parents and your dependants. How will they feel when you are not there anymore?
4. It’s an act of cowardice on the part of the individual. It must be condemned. What if all human beings feel the same way? Then the human race wouldn’t exist at all! People must be made to realize that it is not acceptable in the society.
5. Every life has a purpose. Just because you just haven’t realized it yet, it doesn’t mean you can end your life. You need to keep up hope.
6. Your life belongs to everyone who has ever interacted with you at every stage of your life. People who have seen you and know you. Just think about all of them. How would they feel when you die? Don’t you have nay respect for their feelings too?
And many more...
Of all such explanations that are put forward by various individuals, the one that appealed to me was the last point. You life is not just yours. It belongs to others too. But yes, you are the largest stakeholder and you are in the driver’s seat. But if you control 51% of your life, then the people around you have a stake in the remaining 49% of your life, don’t they?
So the next time you think about giving up your life, remember that your life is not just yours – it belongs to the whole world. Just don’t be the fluttering butterfly that causes a hurricane somewhere else in the world.
5.6.09
Youth Brigade, but “Old is Gold”
The first thing that hits us when we hear/see these names are their surnames – Gandhi, Sangma etc. All of them come from a known family i.e. they have a family legacy behind them. This new-found position is a mere extension of the bloodline, something like a new face over the old body. Living under the shadow of great parents/family is not easy and their family must have had an impact on their way of thinking and working, including their political thought.
I know you may say, “C’mon, you are being too harsh and cynical now, they are new and fresh faces. They have a lot of new ideas and they can effect change from such powerful positions.” I will not argue with you on this as they will certainly bring about a “change”. The question is “Is the change the needed change or the same “change” that we have witnessed for a long time now?”
Change – this word has gained immense prominence after Obama’s ascendency to the most powerful post in the world. The change which took place in the USA was in many forms – shift in ideology (Republican to Democratic), from partisan politics to “unification” politics, from older leaders to younger leaders, from family names to newcomers (First time in 28 years where neither the President nor the Vice-President has the name Bush or Clinton). It was a wholesome change and not just a “old-to-young” change. This real shift came when Obama defeated Hillary Clinton in the primaries, the public rejecting “family name” for a new comer who promised real change. Hillary was a woman, but she carried the tag of a “former first lady” that did not appear to resonate that well with the voters (although I still dispute the result of the primaries). People had already seen Bill and Co. in action, and wanted to see someone different at the helm. Obama was their man.
As much as I criticized Obama the President, I have always acknowledged the fact that his rise has been remarkable - from such poor roots, unconventional childhood, he rose through sheer hardwork. He did not have his mom/dad to support him and teach him to dream big. He achieved what no one thought was possible for atleast another 100 years - a black President, well atleast half black :)
This is where “Pilot” or “Scindia” lag behind as such – they had a headstart. And in a country like India, it is tough for people without that “start” to make it as big as they did. The youth are mere reflections of the legacies of their parents. They have not experienced what we have experienced and what our parents went through. How many of them had to fight for entry into a good school, or fight for a good college education, or even for a job/living? Were they as confused as we were on what to do in life? How many of them have struggled to finance that book club they always wanted to start in school? I am sure that the answer is “NO” to almost all of these questions from their side. They had it all and will continue to have it all too.
I surely love to see young faces, but not those who carry their parents’ legacies. True, they may be more efficient than their illustrious parents or any other older politician in the cabinet. But will they understand the real India? Only time will tell…
19.5.09
Election Analysis (Q&A format)
Well, I am sure you already know a lot about the 15th Lok Sabha (LS) Election results, so I won’t elaborate much on it. However, there are some things I would like to comment on w.r.t this election, answering them in the form of questions that could be raised as debate points.
Going by the rise in the total number of seats for the two major Parties, can we say that the people are more in favour of national parties than regional parties?
No. The number of seats is never an indication of the mood of the people. A better indicator is the vote-share garnered by the different parties. In that aspect, nothing has changed significantly from 2004, as the vote share garnered by these two parties has increased by a mere 0.2% (from 48.7% to 48.9%), which is very insignificant compared to the rise in the number of seats garnered by the combo (from 283 to 321, a rise of 13.4%).
Also, the wins of Nitish Kumar (Bihar), Naveen Patnaik (Orissa), Karunanidhi (Tamil Nadu) and the showing of NCP and Shiv Sena (in Maharashtra) can clearly out to rest the fact that regional parties are on their way out – their showing actually points to the opposite fact that they are actually here to stay. Also the regional effect was seen clearly in the forms of YSR (AP), Hooda (HR), Gehlot (Raj), Ms. Dixit (DEL) and Modi (Gujarat).
Is this house a lot cleaner as compared to the previous house? And has the recession affected the fortunes of the MPs?
Is the “Rahul Effect” a reality? Did the “Modi Effect” change anything for the BJP in the positive sense?
Ciao for now!
11.5.09
The 5-Phase Election Fever (Part 2)
Hi
The Andhera Pradesh state has thrown up a lot of surprises this election, especially with Badi Maa banking on “I-am-Sam” Ever Reddy to deliver the goods. But Reddy is also clever enough to realize that he will not be able to stand on his own two feet this time on. Already the “Grand-Alliance”, consisting of Mr. “Maine-NTR-ko-nahin-maara” Cycle Babuji, Mr. “Telangana-ke-liye-kuch-bhi-karega” Chandu Gaadu and some “educated naxalites” has claimed victory. But in all probability, the GA will also fall short of a majority. This is because of the new entrant Mr. “Chiru-is-King” Megastar, who is said to be the real kingmaker in this election, both at the state and also at the national level. Currently, both the alliances are in tough with the Megastar for a possible post-poll alliance. But at the national level, Chandu Gaadu is clearly tired of being sidelined and has already shown his support to the NDA in a rally held on Sunday. He has firmly professed his support for Buddhe ki-vaani who was promised the creation of a new state within 100 days (on the lines of Obama who promised a trrop withdrawl within 100 days and already the 100 days are up with no such action).
For the glossary of terms used, please refer to this LINK. For Part-1 of this series, please look at this LINK.
9.5.09
The 5-Phase Election Fever (Part 1)
Hi
For the glossary of terms used, please refer to this LINK.
Part 2 of the Fever will be up soon...


